Steig Larsson vs. the rest of the adult fiction world

Working in the circulation department at the library, it is an understatement to say that I see a lot of adult fiction go through, and I would have to say that probably 95% of it looks mediocre at best.  You have your stereotypical crime dramas, court room dramas, family dramas, romances, and chick lit, most of which seems to be cranked out weekly by a monkey on a mimeograph.  I mean the new James Patterson book has 246 requests on it right now.  246!  This is also the third book that has been published this year with his name on it, and I realize he has people who write this stuff for him, but it's May.  May!  How good could these books POSSIBLY be?

That being said, I just finished reading The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest by Steig Larsson, and I am having trouble finding the words to adequately express how impressed and awed I am right now.  Lisbeth Salander is the most bad ass female character ever.  The Millennium Trilogy was excellent from its start to its untimely finish, and, I will only say this once, I wish there were more books.  And it isn't even that I just want another story just because apparently Larsson was planning on writing more before he died in 2004, but I really feel like there is more to Salander's character, and I'm slightly bitter that I don't get to know her any better than these three books allow.  Steig Larsson is really truly a marvel.  He keeps the essential tension and the suspense going throughout all of his story arcs, and there are a lot of them.  All necessary.  All playing into one another.  He develops even his most minor characters, but his main characters, good lord, have heaps upon heaps of layers and flaws and... man.  I feel like with these three novels he elevated the genre of crime drama to a high art.  These books are so good, and they will be some of my favorites, and recommended to library patrons for a long long time.

I am about to confess something:

I have a total author-crush on John Green.  I've read all four of his books and subscribe to his vlog Brotherhood 2.0 and frequent his website and have seriously considered joining twitter just so I could @ him, and I may have a giant panda crush on him/his books/his writing.

That being said, I finished WGWG at about 11:15, which is good, because I didn't finish it at, like, 3:15, but bad because it is over.  I really started out not liking David Levithan's Will Grayson, but then I really liked him, and I think I ended up liking John Green's Will Grayson a lot less than DL's because JG's Will Grayson was kind of a bitch, who, yeah, came of age and stuff, but he whined about it a lot.  Par exemple, there was one point when he was crying around page 220, and I wasn't sure really why he was so upset and I felt like saying, "buck up, JG's Will Grayson, because you can't go through life crying like a little bitch," but I guess that's what you were supposed to think, because if nothing else both David Levithan and John Green construct some exceptionally believable characters, even if they are sometimes just a little too wise.

One thing that I was really impressed with in WGWG though was how distinct the two author's voices were.  I don't know why I even thought about it in the first place, but I was worried that I wouldn't be able to tell who wrote which part, but it was obvious after the first couple of words who each author's Will Grayson was.  Then, after I got over that, I sort of marveled through the rest of the book how difficult it must be and how much patience you have to have to write a book with someone else.  I think that I would have too many opinions about how I wanted the other writer's character to think and act, and there is this one character, Tiny Cooper, who spans both stories, and, jeez!, what if the other author did something that you didn't like with the character.  Or, even worse, what if the author did something with the character that you liked more?  I just really think it would take a lot of trust to write a book with another person.  DL and JG totally pull it off, though, and I will recommend Will Grayson Will Grayson to lots and lots of people at the library tomorrow.  I loved it!

Frantic Reading

So my classes for the semester are over, which means that until June, when my 12 credit summer from hell (hereafter known as the SFH) commences, I have a super rigorous novel reading schedule.  Currently I'm about half way through The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest by Steig Larsson, which is completely awesome and engrossing, and I'll write about it later, but I've had to put it down for the week because Will Grayson Will Grayson by John Green and David Levithan came in for me at the library.  I was leery of putting down a book in favor of another one, but I just started WGWG at lunch today, and I'm about half way through it now because it is kind of the most perfect book ever.  It's about two boys who live in different suburbs of Chicago and meet accidentally in a porn shop one night.

Honestly, I started out not liking it, I thought it was dragging, and I didn't like one of the Will Graysons, and I was wondering when the two characters would meet and I wished they'd just get around to it already, but let me tell you, the two characters just met, and I was so excited about it that I had to put the book down to come and blog.  And I can guarantee this will be a short post, because I have to get back to reading.  I'll probably stay up entirely too late tonight and finish it, which is good, because I have to start and finish The Red Tent by Anita Diamant by Saturday morning at 10:00.  Also, I don't understand why this isn't on YALSA's nominations, because it is so way awesomer than two of the three I've read so far.

So, I told you my reading schedule was rigorous.  I just wish I could get as amped up about my library science text books as I do about teen books and books about computer hackers with Asperger's.

A Boring Beginning... sigh

Hmm... well, I finished Beautiful Creatures, and I have to say, I wasn't too impressed.  Over all, I'd have to say it was boring, and I am disappointed that my YALSA reading project started off so full of suck.  I just wasn't drawn in to the characters or their world.  I didn't think the relationship between Ethan and Lena came across very strong.  They have this psychic connection, so, you know, they can talk to each other from across town and stuff, but I just didn't feel it.  It takes more than just saying "these two people have a strong connection and are in love" to make it feel believable.  

There were also points in the narrative that I had to stop and re-read because the authors would mention a detail that I was supposed to have gotten before but missed, or the action was choppy and I'd be reading along and then suddenly the scene would change, and it was a complete non sequitur and I would be mightily confused, but I just kept reading and brushed it off because I wanted the book to be over.  

I also didn't understand the title.  Who or what are the beautiful creatures?  Are they supposed to be Lena and Ethan being beautiful together?  I just didn't get it.  I like when titles mean something in the context of the book.  I think that if someone would have asked ME (which no one did, and I can't imagine why) I would have titled it Sixteen Moons.  This would have made more sense.  I'm also worried that they are going to attempt a series out of this, because the main characters are in tenth grade, so they could do at least a trilogy while they're still in high school.  Ugh, I hope not. (UPDATE: They are.  Beautiful Darkness comes out in October.)

On the plus side, the librarian in the book was portrayed as eccentric but cool, which I appreciate, but that's just about this book's only redeeming factor.

So even though the first book was suck-y, I'm still excited about reading most of the other books on the list.  Right now though, I'm starting The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest by Steig Larsson, which I am super pumped to be reading (a month before it comes out in the US, whoops).